Skip to content
Qentak — The Education Operating System

ACCESSIBILITY & INCLUSION

Participation starts
with a usable experience.

Evaluate readable, keyboard-accessible and understandable education workflows with the people who use them.

Try the scenarios
University learner using a wheelchair and an access coordinator reviewing a library entrance in autumn
THE PEOPLESet evaluation needs

Identify user groups, assistive technologies and procurement criteria, including any required accessibility documentation.

01 / 03

START WITH THE QUESTION

Can someone complete the task in the way they need to?

Accessibility is part of completing everyday work: finding a form, understanding an error, reviewing a result or confirming an appointment. Evaluate the whole task with real users and assistive settings, including the documents and connected services involved.

Interactive conceptIllustrative scenarios · Sample information

Explore accessibility & inclusive experiences in practice.

Choose a perspective to see what changes.

01 / 03

A clear route without a pointer

A user moves through the task in a meaningful order, opens a control and returns to the place they started.

Focus remains visible and the task can be completed without a mouse.

Keyboard navigationAccessibility & inclusive experiences
Start
Identify the task heading
Move
Reach each control in order
Act
Open, choose and confirm
Recover
Close and return to the trigger

WHAT MAKES IT USEFUL

Evaluate access through real educational tasks.

01

Design for varied interaction

Consider keyboard use, touch, screen readers, zoom and reduced motion from the start. A single visual demonstration cannot represent every user’s experience.

02

Content is part of usability

Use clear labels, descriptive links and instructions before a complex action. Avoid forcing users to infer meaning from icons, color or unexplained abbreviations.

03

Test a complete journey

Evaluate entry, task completion, error recovery and confirmation. Include exported documents, attachments and connected providers where they affect the outcome.

FROM DISCUSSION TO DAILY WORK

Test, resolve barriers, and retest with users.

  1. 1

    Set evaluation needs

    Identify user groups, assistive technologies and procurement criteria, including any required accessibility documentation.

  2. 2

    Test priority tasks

    Review admissions, classroom work and family interactions with representative users and automated checks where useful.

  3. 3

    Track and retest issues

    Assign an owner, describe the effect on task completion and verify the correction in the original scenario.

Adult learner studying with headphones and a notebook at a home deskAccessibility & inclusive experiencesSet evaluation needs → Track and retest issues

SEE HOW THE WORK CONNECTS

Accessibility & inclusive experiences

Can someone complete the task in the way they need to?

  1. 01

    Set evaluation needs

    Identify user groups, assistive technologies and procurement criteria, including any required accessibility documentation.

  2. 02

    Test priority tasks

    Review admissions, classroom work and family interactions with representative users and automated checks where useful.

  3. 03

    Track and retest issues

    Assign an owner, describe the effect on task completion and verify the correction in the original scenario.

Illustrative workflow · Shape the details around your institution.

CONFIGURE WITH INTENTION

Name accessibility requirements and review owners.

  • Clear terminology, labels and accessible institutional content
  • Task-specific assistive technology and browser testing
  • Reduced-motion and responsive interaction expectations
  • Issue reporting, acceptance criteria and remediation ownership
Explore the implementation journey

QUESTIONS TO RESOLVE

Questions about accessibility & inclusive experiences.

Use these questions to make the evaluation specific to your institution.

Is this a formal accessibility conformance statement?

No. This page describes the evaluation approach and design considerations. Request the current evidence and agreed conformance scope for the product and deployment being assessed before making a procurement decision.

How does the public website handle motion?

The public website respects the device’s reduced-motion preference. Hero rotation is disabled in that mode, manual navigation remains available and decorative transitions are removed.

What should an accessibility issue report include?

Describe the page, task, browser, device and assistive setting, then explain the expected outcome and what happened. Avoid including student records or other sensitive information in a general contact request.

YOUR INSTITUTION. YOUR CONTEXT.

Put your users’ priority tasks at the center of the demo.

Start with a real workflow, the people involved and the outcome you need.