Skip to content
Qentak — The Education Operating System

QENTAK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

From admission to award. A campus that works together.

Connect registry, faculties, departments, bursary and student services around the academic journey. Explore education management for universities, colleges and tertiary institutions with complex programs, credit structures and campus responsibilities.

Plan an institutional walkthrough
University registrar, faculty adviser and adult student reviewing course selections and an academic calendar
THE PEOPLEOffer to matriculation

Admissions confirms entry conditions; registry establishes the student identity and program cohort.

01 / 03

What should a university management system connect?

A university management system should connect the student’s program and curriculum version with registration, approved academic results, finance responsibilities and service handovers. Registry, faculty and bursary need different views of the same accountable academic history.

Use the language of your academic model.

01

Programs, credits and curriculum versions

Map faculties, schools and departments to awards, programs, course units and academic sessions. Preserve the curriculum version attached to each cohort so a later catalog change does not silently change a student’s requirements.

02

Registration with academic context

Bring prerequisite checks, credit loads, electives, add/drop periods and repeat courses into the registration discussion. Identify who reviews an exception and how a faculty decision reaches registry and the student.

03

Progression and award decisions

Connect moderated results, credit accumulation, academic standing and outstanding requirements. Define the approval path for progression, resits, graduation eligibility and amendments to an issued academic record.

Connect the people who keep a university moving.

01

Registry and admissions

Follow applications, entry routes, transfer credit, matriculation, course registration and transcript requests. Keep a traceable record of decisions rather than circulating separate student lists between offices.

02

Deans, heads of department and lecturers

Plan teaching allocations, course offerings, assessment periods and moderation responsibilities. Give academic advisers the relevant student context while keeping confidential support records restricted.

03

Bursary and student services

Align tuition schedules, sponsors, scholarships and payment plans with the student’s status. Coordinate residence, library and accessibility referrals with named service owners and clear next steps.

Plan for institutional complexity, not just a larger school.

01

Research and postgraduate pathways

Include supervision milestones, dissertation or thesis review, examination panels and completion decisions in discovery. Agree which responsibilities sit in Qentak and which remain in specialist research systems.

02

Senate, quality assurance and accreditation

Define how academic changes are proposed, reviewed and approved. Agree the evidence required for program review and regulatory returns, including definitions, reporting periods and accountable sign-off.

03

Multiple campuses and connected systems

Distinguish shared institutional records from faculty and campus ownership. Review identity, learning platforms, library systems, payment services and existing finance systems before choosing integration boundaries.

THE CONNECTED JOURNEY

Follow the institutional handovers.

01

Offer to matriculation

Admissions confirms entry conditions; registry establishes the student identity and program cohort.

02

Registration to teaching

Approved course choices inform teaching lists, timetables, fee responsibilities and academic advising.

03

Assessment to progression

Lecturers submit results, authorized academic teams moderate them, and registry records approved progression.

04

Completion to lifelong record

Review award eligibility, release approved transcripts and preserve the academic history for future requests.

A SCENARIO TO TEST

Test a transfer student’s first registration.

A student joins the second year of an engineering degree with credits from another institution. The receiving faculty accepts some prior learning, but one prerequisite remains outstanding. A sponsor covers tuition while the student pays residence charges. A useful evaluation follows that complete case through the responsible offices.

Faculty decision
Which credits are accepted, which curriculum requirements remain, and who approves a prerequisite exception?
Registry record
How are the original evidence, credit decision, course selection and approval history connected without rewriting the prior institution’s record?
Bursary handover
Which charge belongs to the sponsor, what remains payable by the student, and how are corrections reconciled?
Acceptance evidence
Produce an agreed registration outcome and an academic history that registry and the faculty can explain.

This page focuses on degree and campus administration. Postgraduate research and polytechnic practical pathways have dedicated pages for their additional requirements.

University researchers collecting a water sample with their professor at a wetlandUniversities & tertiary institutionsOffer to matriculation → Assessment to progression

SEE HOW THE WORK CONNECTS

Universities & tertiary institutions

Connect registry, faculties, departments, bursary and student services around the academic journey. Explore education management for universities, colleges and tertiary institutions with complex programs, credit structures and campus responsibilities.

  1. 01

    Offer to matriculation

    Admissions confirms entry conditions; registry establishes the student identity and program cohort.

  2. 02

    Registration to teaching

    Approved course choices inform teaching lists, timetables, fee responsibilities and academic advising.

  3. 03

    Assessment to progression

    Lecturers submit results, authorized academic teams moderate them, and registry records approved progression.

Illustrative workflow · Shape the details around your institution.

MAKE THE PLAN YOURS

Prepare a demonstration that reflects your institution.

Use this session checklist to identify what is ready and what needs an owner.

0 of 5 ready

Continue with the people and workflows involved.

The practical questions.

Can different faculties use different academic rules?

Bring the differences into discovery: calendars, grading, credit loads, prerequisites and approval structures. The demonstration and implementation scope should show which rules are shared and which are faculty-specific.

Does this replace a learning or research platform?

Not automatically. Agree the system of record and integration responsibility for each workflow. Course delivery, research administration and specialist repositories may remain in existing systems.

How do we evaluate fit before a campus-wide rollout?

Use one complete faculty scenario, including an exception: admission, registration, fee treatment, results review and transcript output. Agree evidence of acceptance with registry, faculty, finance and IT before expanding.

TAKE THE NEXT STEP

Make the next demonstration about your academic model.

Bring a program structure, a workflow and an exception. Let the walkthrough address the work your teams actually do.

Book a tailored demo