Skip to content
Qentak — The Education Operating System

QENTAK FOR EDUCATION REGULATORS & INSPECTORS

Trace the evidence behind the institutional picture.

Evaluate how an education management system supports inspection evidence, reporting definitions, institutional accountability, and proportionate access across the learner journey.

Try the workflow preview
Inspector in plum and a school quality lead reviewing an evidence binder
THE PEOPLEComparable reporting

Define the population, period, exclusions, and calculation behind a submitted attendance, enrollment, or outcome measure before comparing institutions.

01 / 03

START WITH THE RESPONSIBILITY

Priorities for education regulators & inspectors.

01

Comparable reporting

Define the population, period, exclusions, and calculation behind a submitted attendance, enrollment, or outcome measure before comparing institutions.

02

Evidence that can be traced

Connect an institutional statement to its source, version, responsible owner, and approval. Distinguish a policy document from evidence that the policy operates in practice.

03

Follow-through after inspection

Record the finding, institutional response, accountable owner, due date, and evidence needed to review closure.

REMOVE THE DISCONNECTED HANDOFFS

Less chasing. Clearer next steps.

The point of a connected workflow is to help people act with the right context.

A headline number hides its basis

Two institutions submit totals with different definitions.

Request the reporting scope and reconciliation alongside the total, with a route for correcting the submission.

Evidence arrives without provenance

A file is supplied with no reporting period or owner.

Agree an evidence register with version, scope, approval, and controlled sharing before the review begins.

EXPLORE A CONNECTED WORKFLOW

Follow a working day: comparable reporting and beyond.

Choose a stage, then a responsibility. See the context and the practical action that connects it to the next person.

Education Regulators & Inspectors/Your connected workflow
Illustrative preview

Define the context

Comparable reporting

Define the population, period, exclusions, and calculation behind a submitted attendance, enrollment, or outcome measure before comparing institutions.

01illustrative review stage

Explore a responsibility

Work through the decision

Define the population, period, exclusions, and calculation behind a submitted attendance, enrollment, or outcome measure before comparing institutions.

The next useful action

Reach a reviewable finding from defined evidence, then follow the institution’s corrective response.

Example content and counts explain the workflow. This is an interactive public preview, not an institution account.

A DECISION FROM YOUR WORKING DAY

Two attendance submissions use different denominators

The context you need

One school includes learners admitted partway through the period; another excludes them. Compare scope, session definitions, and enrollment dates before drawing a conclusion from the rates.

What the next person needs from you

Ask each institution for a reconciliation and a corrected or explained submission. Record the agreed definition so the next reporting period is comparable.

Explore reporting definitions

THE WORK DOESN’T STOP AT YOUR DESK

Who education regulators & inspectors coordinate with.

Registry colleagues arranging pathway cards, a tablet and document folders on a deskQentak for Education Regulators & InspectorsComparable reporting → Follow-through after inspection

SEE HOW THE WORK CONNECTS

From institutional evidence to a reviewable finding

Oversight connects reporting definitions, provenance, and a proportionate response.

  1. 01

    Comparable reporting

    Define the population, period, exclusions, and calculation behind a submitted attendance, enrollment, or outcome measure before comparing institutions.

  2. 02

    Evidence that can be traced

    Connect an institutional statement to its source, version, responsible owner, and approval. Distinguish a policy document from evidence that the policy operates in practice.

  3. 03

    Follow-through after inspection

    Record the finding, institutional response, accountable owner, due date, and evidence needed to review closure.

Illustrative workflow · Shape the details around your institution.

INFORMATION THAT SUPPORTS A DECISION

The decisions your reports need to support.

01

Reporting reconciliation

Compare submitted totals against the agreed population, period, and excluded records. Record unresolved differences.

02

Remediation status

Separate actions completed by an institution from actions whose evidence the reviewer has accepted.

WHEN THE DAY TAKES YOU ELSEWHERE

Keep the next step within reach.

Plan the mobile experience around the tasks worth doing away from a desk, with the same responsibility for access and sensitive information.

Explore the mobile approach
Education Regulators & Inspectors

Prepare the conversation

Define the population, period, exclusions, and calculation behind a submitted attendance, enrollment, or outcome measure before comparing institutions.

Follow an assigned action

Reach a reviewable finding from defined evidence, then follow the institution’s corrective response.

Relevant context, wherever your work takes you.

THE CAPABILITIES BEHIND YOUR WORK

Explore the detail that matters to you.

RESPONSIBILITY SHAPES ACCESS

The right context. The right boundaries.

External oversight is not permission to browse every learner record. Agree the authority, scope, redaction, access expiry, and institutional approval for each evidence request.

Explore security and governance

Questions from education regulators & inspectors.

Does Qentak certify an institution’s compliance?

No. Software can organize evidence and responsibilities; the competent authority determines requirements and evaluates compliance. Country, sector, and inspection requirements must be agreed for the deployment.

Would regulators have unrestricted live access?

No. Determine legal authority, purpose, period, and minimum information before any access or disclosure. A controlled evidence submission may be more appropriate than an ongoing account.

MAKE THE WALKTHROUGH ABOUT YOUR WORK

Plan a walkthrough for education regulators & inspectors.

Bring a typical task, the people involved, and the handoff you would most like to improve.