Skip to content
Qentak — The Education Operating System

Institutional Management

Forms & Surveys

Collect information with a clear next use.

Collect structured information from the right audience and connect responses to institutional follow-up.

Try the workflow
Inspector in plum and a school quality lead reviewing an evidence binder
THE PEOPLEStructured questions

Choose fields and response rules that fit the information being requested.

01 / 03

START WITH THE ACTUAL WORK

Why connect forms & surveys?

A form should ask only what its purpose needs and lead to a meaningful response or decision after submission.

WHAT THIS CAPABILITY BRINGS TOGETHER

Forms & Surveys: records, decisions, and handovers.

01

Structured questions

Choose fields and response rules that fit the information being requested.

02

A deliberate audience

Define who can respond and whether identification is necessary.

03

Response follow-through

Review results or route individual responses into the relevant action.

FOLLOW THE WORK FROM START TO FINISH

Explore the forms & surveys workflow.

This interactive illustration explains the operating model. It contains no live institutional records.

Institutional control workspaceIllustrative preview
Evidence → ownership → decision
1

Structured questions

Choose fields and response rules that fit the information being requested.

Owned action
2

A deliberate audience

Define who can respond and whether identification is necessary.

Owned action
3

Response follow-through

Review results or route individual responses into the relevant action.

Owned action
STEP 1 OF 4

Design a form

Design questions around a defined institutional purpose.

A WORKED EXAMPLE · ILLUSTRATIVE SCENARIO

A submitted response should lead somewhere useful

A school collects activity choices through a form, but some responses request places that are already full. A spreadsheet of answers does not resolve allocation.

The decision and its context

Define the purpose, required fields, respondent context and responsible review team. Distinguish submission receipt from approval, and connect an accepted response to the relevant operational record.

What a complete outcome looks like

The respondent should understand what happens next. The owner should identify duplicate or incomplete responses and unresolved allocation decisions.

FOLLOW THE HANDOVERClubs & ActivitiesActivity choices need capacity checks and confirmation within the participation workflow.

A CAPABILITY, NOT AN ISLAND

Connect forms & surveys with the next workflow.

The same institutional context should support the next responsible team’s action. Explore the connected capabilities.

YOUR INSTITUTION’S RULES

Set the rules for forms & surveys.

  • Field types and conditional questions
  • Audience, anonymity, and response windows
  • Validation and follow-up responsibilities
Explore configuration and flexibility

WHEN THE DAY DOESN’T FOLLOW THE DEFAULT

A response needs individual follow-up

Route it to the appropriate owner without exposing the respondent’s private information in aggregate reporting.

A clear exception keeps the reason, owner, and next decision visible.
School board members discussing a campus plan in a timber meeting roomForms & SurveysStructured questions → Response follow-through

SEE HOW THE WORK CONNECTS

Forms & Surveys

Administrative teams · Researchers. Choose fields and response rules that fit the information being requested.

  1. 01

    Structured questions

    Choose fields and response rules that fit the information being requested.

  2. 02

    A deliberate audience

    Define who can respond and whether identification is necessary.

  3. 03

    Response follow-through

    Review results or route individual responses into the relevant action.

Illustrative workflow · Shape the details around your institution.

AUTOMATION WITH A PURPOSE

When a qualifying response is submitted.

Use an agreed trigger and response while keeping the responsible person in the decision.

WHEN

A qualifying response is submitted

THEN

Prepare the agreed follow-up task with only the necessary response fields.

How connected workflows work

APPROPRIATE CONTROL

Who can act on forms & surveys?

State the collection purpose, restrict sensitive fields, and distinguish an anonymous survey from an identifiable service request.

Explore security and institutional control

KNOW WHETHER THE CHANGE IS HELPING

Useful responses

Review completion, missing or unclear answers, and whether the resulting follow-up was actually completed.

Agree the baseline, reporting period, and owner before comparing results.Connect evidence to decisions

SEE IT IN YOUR CONTEXT

Different institutions. Specific responsibilities.

A practical introduction

Bring a representative workflow, one recurring exception, and the people who own the handoffs.

Plan your implementation

BEFORE THE CONVERSATION

Useful questions about forms & surveys.

Can a survey be anonymous?

Anonymity requires the form, stored identifiers, access, and reporting design to match that promise; it must be intentionally configured.

What evidence should an implementation review include?

Use named process owners, representative records, permission checks, and agreed acceptance criteria. Record the results and outstanding actions before expanding the rollout.

PUT YOUR PROCESS IN THE PICTURE

Explore forms & surveys in your institution.

Start with your current workflow, the decisions that take time, and the handoffs you want to improve.

This public page presents Qentak’s capability model and an illustrative workflow. Available modules, integrations, operating rules, and rollout scope are established in your implementation plan.

Explore all 69 capabilities